Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Analysis: Bad care for poor, bad for all?

States with the worst healthcare for the poor have the worst healthcare for everyone, health experts said this week.

"Health system performance -- which affects everyone -- is tied to how well the system treats the most vulnerable," said Alan Weil, executive director of the National Academy for State Health Policy.

Variations between states were so wide that care for the wealthy in low-ranking states was almost on par with care for the poor in highly rated states in many areas examined by the study. About 56 percent of wealthier seniors did not get all recommended care in the bottom five states compared with 61 percent of low-income seniors in the top five states.

"Everyone's health suffers when the system fails to meet the needs of even a small number of people," Weil said.

Because of the connection between quality, access and equity, making sure no one is left behind when it comes to healthcare could have a big impact on a state's physical -- and financial -- health, according to the report.

If all states could do as well as the top states, 22 million adults and children would gain health insurance coverage and 90,000 premature deaths would be prevented, the report says.

No comments: