Showing posts with label emergency room care. Show all posts
Showing posts with label emergency room care. Show all posts

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Experts Say Texas Needs Healthcare Reform

HOUSTON -- Many of the state’s elected officials – including Gov. Rick Perry and a number of state legislators – refuse to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), despite Texas having the largest proportion of uninsured citizens in the nation.

According to experts who spoke during an ethnic media roundtable discussion in Houston, fully implementing the ACA is the right thing to do. The  roundtable was organized by New America Media.
“Expanding Medicaid will save lives,” said Charhonda Cox, executive director for Texans Together. “Everybody pays less when more people have insurance. Costs go down and quality of care goes up.”

The expansion, which is one component of the larger ACA, is set to take effect in January 2014 and would guarantee coverage for families earning at or below 133 percent of the federal poverty level.
Currently, there are about a quarter of Texans (6.2 million people) are uninsured. With the expansion in place that number is projected to drop down to just under 12 percent.

In addition to more healthcare coverage for adults and children, the expansion would also bring in billions of dollars in federal funds to the state.

For the first three years, the federal government would cover 100 percent of the costs. By the fourth year, states that choose to keep the expansion would pay a percentage of it out of their own budgets.
“This is a great financial deal,” said Laura Guerra-Cardua, Texas associate director for the Children’s Defense Fund. “Over the next 10 years, we would have to put in $15 billion to get $90 billion back. This is money infused back into our communities, creates tens of thousands of jobs and could really benefit everyone.”

Still, there are opponents who argue that expanding coverage would cost the state too much, especially long term.

Eva DeLuna Castro, senior budget analyst for the Center for Public Policy Priorities in Austin, said many legislators fear that Texas would get stuck paying for the program well after the initial free years.

“It doesn’t make sense to refuse to do a good thing now because 10 years down the road it might present a challenge,” she said. “At least for 10 years we had something good happening for our children and our adults.”

Moreover, Guerra-Cardua said taxpayers would end up paying for Medicaid costs regardless of whether Texas accepts the expansion.

“People who are uninsured still get sick,” she said. “But the difference is, they usually wait to go to the doctor and when they show up, they are much more sick…and they go to the emergency room, which is far more expensive than a doctor’s visit.

“When costs are not covered by these families, they are passed on to local taxes,” she said. “And we pay for them without the opportunity to get federal tax dollars back to help pay for that care.”
Cox said with the legislative session ending in May, there is not much time left to change the minds of legislators who refuse to accept the expansion.

“We want to make sure the folks we put in office have pressure to vote yes,” she said. “The only way they’ll do that is if they know that the people who can vote for them again want this to happen.”

source

Monday, June 27, 2011

Economy drives ER visit influx

Local hospital officials say use of their emergency rooms has risen. The reason could be that more people put off primary care doctor visits because they don’t have health insurance or they can’t afford them.

Increasing ER visits is a national trend, West Valley Medical Center CEO Julie Taylor said. ER visits from patients without health insurance lead to a shift in costs to people with insurance — helping drive up the overall cost of health care.

“People that aren’t insured that come in and use the service are using a more expensive type of care,” Saint Alphonsus Medical Center-Nampa CEO Karl Keeler said, “which only increases the burden of the insured.”

The struggling economy likely causes more people to rely on ERs for medical treatment because those departments must treat all patients.

West Valley Medical Center has seen a 7 percent increase in emergency room visits compared to last year and Saint Alphonsus-Nampa a 5 percent increase. Those hospitals also have experienced an influx in the number of patients who are uninsured and/or qualify for charity.

When people put off medical care because they can’t afford it or don’t want to pay for it, often their health problems become worse and more expensive to treat. ER visits, even for nonserious medical conditions, cost more than visits to primary care doctors’ offices.

“People are calling 911 because the cold that they had has now settled in the chest, and it’s full-blown pneumonia,” Caldwell Fire Chief Mark Wendelsdorf said. “They’re pushed to the end where they feel like that’s their only recourse.”

The Caldwell Fire Department had about a 5 percent increase in medical calls last year, Wendelsdorf said. He expects about the same this year.

Wendelsdorf also said he thinks more people have accidents requiring emergency medical service when they take on home repair or maintenance jobs that they may have paid professionals to do in the past.

source

Friday, June 3, 2011

Massachusetts health reform didn't cut ER visits

(Reuters Health) - Health care reform in Massachusetts only had a small impact on the number of trips residents took to the emergency room, according to a new study.

Contrary to expectations that easier access to primary care would reduce ER use, the total number of ER visits at 11 hospitals increased slightly after reform was implemented -- a pattern similar to that seen in other states.

"There was perhaps a perception that if we could just get people insurance they won't need the ER anymore," said Dr. Peter Smulowitz, the study's lead author from Harvard Medical School in Boston. But, "you cannot ever redirect every visitor, perhaps even the majority of visitors, away from the ER," he told Reuters Health.

Estimates have shown that the state's reform was successful in cutting its number of uninsured people by about three quarters.

Supporters of the reforms hoped that insurance would allow people to see a primary care doctor before health problems get serious enough to warrant an ER trip, with the added bonus of easing pressure on crowded emergency departments.

To assume that insuring more people will drastically cut down on the need for emergency care "is a dangerous policy choice," Smulowitz said, partly because there are many different factors that influence statewide use of ERs.

Massachusetts' health care reform required everyone in the state to have health insurance and made subsidized insurance available to residents who were uninsured or had limited coverage.

The legislation was enacted in 2006, when Mitt Romney -- now an opponent of current national health reform legislation -- was governor, and fully implemented by 2008.

Smulowitz and his colleagues used hospital billing data to compare the number of ER visits at 11 Massachusetts hospitals during nine-month periods before and after the state's individual insurance mandate was implemented in January 2008.

Total visits increased from about 425,000 in the first nine months of 2006 to 442,000 over the same period in 2008 -- a four-percent rise.

When the researchers focused in on the visits that should have been most affected by reform -- visits they classified as "low severity" in people previously uninsured or underinsured -- they found a slight dip of 2.6 percent, from 186,000 visits in 2006 to 182,000 in 2008.

By definition, most people with "low severity" visits could have been treated by a primary care doctor.

The authors note in Annals of Emergency Medicine that even with insurance, some people may have trouble accessing primary care -- for example, if they work during the day and can only get medical help at night or on the weekend. Also, primary care doctors are in limited supply, and people may have trouble booking appointments, Smulowitz added.

"Access to health care is dependent on really more than switching you over to being insured," he said.

Kathy Fuda, a former state health worker who researched emergency room use but was not involved in the current study, said policymakers may have been "overly optimistic" about health care reform's impact on ER visits.

People with insurance are the ones driving increases in ER use, she said - mainly because there are many more insured than uninsured people, at least in Massachusetts.

Fuda, now at Abt Associates, a health and policy research organization in Cambridge, Massachusetts, added that it's possible people who were previously uninsured might even use the ER more after they get insurance, if they couldn't afford to pay out-of-pocket for an ER visit before. "There are really conflicting trends there," she told Reuters Health. "It's not a completely simple picture."

The authors said that longer-term studies will be needed to see if patterns in ER use change over the years after reform. They also note that the current study couldn't look at patterns in all Massachusetts hospitals.

In terms of extrapolating to national health care reform, Smulowitz said that "the only message that one can really conclude...is that increasing access to health insurance is not going to make major changes in utilization of the emergency department."

source

Note: It might be difficult to measure the financial impact of previously uninsured being able to access care before small problems worsen and require lengthy hospital stays, but a study of the economic impact of increased reimbursements for emergency room visits on the economic health of hospitals and cost for care would help in understanding the overall picture. Another relevant statistic would be a change in the number of deaths resulting from lack of health insurance prior to reform.

Friday, February 18, 2011

U.S. Retail Clinics Expected to Double by 2015, Could Partner With Health Systems

The number of retail medical clinics in the United States could double by 2015, according to The ConvUrgentCare Market Report by Merchant Medicine.

There are currently 1,200 retail clinics in the United States and that number is projected to reach 2,000 to 2,500 by 2015 as health consumers seeks out lower-cost, more convenient primary and urgent care services.

Growth in the overall urgent care industry is expected to be only moderate. Today's 4,500 clinics are anticipated to grow to around 5,500 by 2015.

The future of retail clinics is expected to be greatly shaped by their relationships with hospitals and their role in accountable care organizations. CVS' Minute Clinic, which currently has the largest market share of all retail clinics, has recently announced partnerships with Cleveland Clinic, Minneapolis-based Allina Health and Catholic Healthcare West.

source

Monday, July 13, 2009

Getting tight-ER: Economy packing Triad emergency rooms - NC

Emergency room directors across the Triad say the tight economy is causing their waiting rooms to swell even more than they predicted earlier this year.

Hospitals, already strained by dwindling insurance reimbursements and rising costs, are trying to develop new ways to deal with those patients — about a quarter of which will never be able to pay — by fast-tracking cases that aren’t true emergencies.

The ERs at nearly every area hospital have seen steady increases in the number of patients in recent years, with a rise of about 3 percent annually.

This year, the growth rate has more than doubled or tripled at some hospitals as patients lose their employer-sponsored health insurance or delay treatment until manageable conditions require a more intense, immediate and expensive course of action.

Forsyth Medical Center, for example, set an all-time record for emergency patients in May, with 9,424 people streaming through the ER that month. That was almost 9 percent higher than the 8,666 patients the hospital had budgeted for in its annual projections and 10 percent higher than the 8,534 patients who visited during May 2008.

The Winston-Salem metro area alone has lost about 7,600 jobs during the past year, according to the N.C. Employment Security Commission. Jason Carter, vice president of operations at Forsyth Medical Center, said the higher volumes in the ER are almost entirely due to the economy.

“As we have looked at people losing their jobs and becoming either uninsured or underinsured, this has become a very busy place,” Carter said. “We anticipated higher volumes, but all our projections are getting blown out of the water this year.”

As a result, Forsyth Medical Center is trying out a new system of five zones based on patient acuity.

A registered nurse sees patients immediately when they walk through the door to gauge the severity of each case. Three days a week, from 3 p.m. to 11 p.m., a so-called green zone staffed with nurses and a physician assistant will see patients with more minor needs. A yellow zone sees patients who are slightly more serious, while orange serves as a swing unit and red sees the most pressing cases. A blue zone treats patients with behavioral health needs.

Early results show the process is helping relieve wait times. Patients in the green zone previously were waiting 63 minutes before seeing a doctor, but the wait time has dropped to 26 minutes during trials. Total length of stay has gone from two hours and 16 minutes to an hour and 13 minutes.

And Carter says the department is able to see as many patients a day in three rooms as providers were treating in 14 rooms before, which creates more capacity to treat more serious conditions.

In the yellow zone, for those who might need a bit more intensive treatment than the green zone, total length of stay has dropped from roughly four hours to two and a half hours.

While Carter says Forsyth Medical Center is proud of its increased efficiencies, he said the improvements are also aimed at better overall care.

“We’re not looking to put up a billboard that says we guarantee we’ll see you in 90 minutes or under,” he said. “We want people to seek us out because the we can make the experience less miserable and we catch those clinically important things.”

The only alternative
The growth is no different in Guilford County; data show the Greensboro-High Point metro area has lost more than 23,000 jobs during the past year, three times as many as Forsyth.

High Point Regional Medical Center has seen 16,755 patients in its ER, an almost 7 percent increase from the 15,706 emergency patients who came during the same period last year.

“It’s the only alternative (for medical care) that a lot of people have right now,” said Meg Cashion, manager of the emergency department at High Point Regional. “I think that’s probably the biggest factor.”

Cashion said her hospital is also working on new processes to improve patient flow. She declined to elaborate on the process — which is being run on Mondays and will expand to two days a week in August — but she said the goal is to get patients to a doctor sooner and move lower-acuity patients through quickly.

“I can just say we have cut a substantial amount of time” off the average length of stay during trials, Cashion said.

At Wake Forest University Baptist, emergency volumes were 24,487 during the past three months, up about 9 percent from 22,499 during the same period last year.

source

Wednesday, January 28, 2009

Digging deeper into California's hospital crisis

The shrinking state of California hospitals, involving both emergency rooms and pediatric beds, has been in the news recently. The Times offers readers a chance to dig deeper into the story with two databases.

To see which hospitals near you have emergency rooms and which facilities closed emergency departments or shut down entirely since 1998, check out this database.

To see whether hospitals near you still have pediatric wards, check out this.

You can also use our interactive map of Southern California to see for yourself how losses in in-patient beds for children correspond to where children live.

source

Sunday, January 4, 2009

'Quick look' keeps patients moving - Hospitals using a new strategy to ease crowded ERs

A patient at the Memorial-area emergency department barely warms a seat in the waiting room before a nurse beckons and starts asking questions.

Beyond the desk and behind a thin curtain, the nurse checks the patient's blood pressure. During a chat, she assesses the medical problem.

To save time, she may process a urine sample instead of sending out for lab results. Minutes later, a chart or a verbal cue from the nurse alerts the emergency physician about the patient's symptoms.

Such strategies are moving patients more quickly through ERs at Memorial Hermann Memorial City Medical Center and its sister hospitals, a response to a national overcrowding problem that has forced some facilities to divert seriously ill or injured patients elsewhere, sometimes with tragic results.

Memorial Hermann's program is an attempt to address the overcrowding problem by making the ER more efficient. One national expert said the strategy is being used by perhaps 10 percent of hospitals across the country.

In Houston, the ER overcrowding problem has been the subject of several studies calling for revisions to the emergency system. In 2006, the Harris County Hospital District changed policy to redirect patients who show up at the ERs of Ben Taub or LBJ general hospitals without emergency symptoms to community health clinics or urgent care services.

The goal at Memorial Hermann? To give every patient a "quick look" by a nurse or other health professional within five minutes of arrival, then get the sick or injured person to a doctor within 30 minutes.

So far, the average wait to see a physician at the Memorial City emergency center has been cut by an hour — from 93 minutes last spring to 20 minutes in December, according to Jim Parisi, the system executive who oversees emergency services.

The time frame factors in trauma patients rushed from ambulances to operating rooms as well as those who show up with minor injuries.

The strategy to accelerate ER visits expanded to most of Memorial Hermann's other eight hospital emergency centers in December.

Adoption of the new procedures followed reports from the National Center for Health Statistics showing an increase nationally in emergency department wait times.

The center's annual survey in 1997, the first to include such data, put the average wait time to see an emergency physician then at 38 minutes. In the 2006 summary released in August, the average wait was 56 minutes.

Many experts attribute the longer waits to the increased number of people using emergency centers for non-urgent conditions that could be handled in doctor offices.

"Emergency departments are classically good at taking care of the very sick," said Dr. Jorge Trujillo, medical director of emergency services at Memorial City. "Where we have a problem is taking care of people not perceived to be very ill."

Like Memorial Hermann, several emergency centers in the Houston area have sped up the ER process.

St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital in the Texas Medical Center, for instance, opened ER express lanes last year for less-serious ailments, slashing wait times for those patients in half, according to Andrew Eller, clinical educator for the emergency department.

Hospital Corporation of America — which runs The Woman's Hospital of Texas, East Houston Regional Medical Center, West Houston Medical Center and several suburban hospitals — built free-standing, 24-hour emergency centers in Pasadena and Pearland to relieve its traditional emergency rooms. HCA also turned a former Alvin hospital into a 24-hour ER.

Before the Memorial City pilot project started in May, Trujillo said many people waited three to five hours to see him.

On average, it took 1 1/2 hours to see a doctor. One in 10 people left without being seen, hospital administrators said. Crowding and complaints were frequent. Patient satisfaction surveys placed the emergency department in the bottom 10 percent among those of similar hospitals nationwide.

By August, according to hospital figures, the average time to the doctor was just 29 minutes. In December, it was down to 20.

The system's Southwest, Katy, Sugar Land, Southeast, Northeast and Northwest hospitals recently started their versions of faster ER service. The program is slated to move to Memorial Hermann hospitals in The Woodlands and the Texas Medical Center early this year.

Under the program, doctors are involved in the beginning, instead of the end, of a patient's emergency room experience.

"In the past, I never even knew the acute patient was there who had the appendicitis and was waiting for two and a half hours," Trujillo said. "From my practice point of view, I can deliver quality care better — and sooner."

Dr. Art Kellerman, a professor of emergency medicine at Emory University and a former board member of the American College of Emergency Physicians, said the Memorial Hermann strategy is useful, though expensive.

A number of hospitals that involved a doctor or nurse practitioner at the beginning of the triage process later dropped the effort, because it could not be sustained financially, he said.

Parisi acknowledged that Memorial Hermann's program costs a little more. But, for the most part, he said, the new strategy merely reallocates existing personnel.

Kellerman also said the strategy fails to get at the root of the overcrowding problem — that not enough beds are being cleared for patients who arrive at hospitals via ERs.

"Elective surgeries are more profitable — you never hear of elective surgeries being diverted," said Kellerman, who has written about emergency department overcrowding.

At Memorial City, the new triage process took 13 minutes on average at the start of the program; now it's down to about three minutes. Today, only 2 percent of patients leave without being seen. Trujillo said complaints have decreased to a few a month, and patient satisfaction has improved significantly.

full article

Friday, December 19, 2008

City clinics' burden spills over to ERs (Baltimore)

Hospitals provide disproportionate amount of primary care, study finds

A growing number of Baltimore residents are being treated in hospitals for illnesses that could be prevented with routine medical care, a new study has found. The health commissioner says the data show "a fundamental failure" of the city's health system.

City residents are being hospitalized or treated in emergency rooms for such conditions as asthma and high blood pressure at rates that are roughly twice those in surrounding counties and statewide, according to the Rand Corp. study.

Baltimore's health commissioner, Dr. Joshua M. Sharfstein, says the problem is the inevitable result of clinics that are stretched to capacity and a shortage of primary care doctors to serve the poor.

"Our city's hospitals are the envy of the world," Sharfstein said. "But in the shadow of the hospitals, the clinics are overburdened. It's not one or the other, it's got to be both. We want the best hospital in the world, but we also want a better primary care."

The report was commissioned by the city Health Department with funding by Baltimore's Straus Foundation in an effort to determine how reliant city residents have become on hospital care.

Researchers analyzed 2000-2007 hospital discharge data from the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission to determine the rate of emergency room visits and hospitalizations for conditions that often can be prevented if people see doctors regularly. They examined the figures by age group, sections of the city and common conditions.

Among the findings: More than 800 children were hospitalized last year for asthma attacks, nearly 1,000 people ages 40 to 64 were admitted for diabetes, and roughly 1,900 people 65 and older were hospitalized with dehydration.

In comparing the figures, researchers were surprised by how high Baltimore's hospitalization rates were compared with those of Washington, which has a similar proportion of low-income residents without health insurance.

For example, last year in Washington, 28 per 1,000 residents were admitted to hospitals for conditions that could have been avoided. In Baltimore, the figure was 42 per 1,000 residents.

Still, the challenges in reforming the primary care system in each city are similar, said Dr. Nicole Lurie, a professor of policy analysis at Rand and one of the study's authors.

"I think the community will to really create a comprehensive system access for underserved populations has been a historic struggle," she said. "One of the things that reports like this we hope will do is shine a light on that and stimulate a community-wide commitment to get there."

Lurie stressed that while the study suggests that a lack of access to primary care is a problem, it does not explain the whole story. Neither does the report indicate what needs to be fixed.

"This is a snapshot of what the problem is," she said. "It doesn't tell us the degree to which [patients] have primary care doctors, the degree to which they can't afford their medicine or whether primary care is available and people feel they are not treated well so they don't go."

Other experts say the study highlights a long-known shortage of primary care options in inner cities. Dr. Leiyu Shi, a professor of health policy at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said community health centers need more funding and doctors must be given financial incentives to treat low-income patients.

Shi said the long-term solution should start in medical schools, by pushing students to become primary care doctors rather than pursuing more lucrative specialties.

"This is something that is repeatedly being observed over the last decade," he said. "And this trend is getting worse now because of the economic recession and the lack of investment in the primary care system of our country."

Sharfstein said he plans to use the study's findings to hold public hearings next year to seek ways to improve access. Reform would not only help keep city residents healthy but would also avoid costly hospitalizations and emergency room visits, he said.

"This shows that the state is spending many millions of dollars each year on hospital care that could be avoided with better access to outpatient services," he said.

For now, busy city emergency rooms are filling gaps in care, said Dr. Kayvan Rafei, head of pediatric emergency medicine at University of Maryland Medical Center, who oversees an emergency department program for children with asthma. The program was launched in 2003 after physicians noticed a surging number of visits from children with asthma, many of whom had never been diagnosed.

Doctors used to treat asthma attacks, then urge parents to follow up with their child's primary care doctor. But the follow-up rarely happened.

"Studies have shown in inner-city populations like what we serve, less than 6 percent of children follow up with a primary care provider within a week of coming to the ER," he said. "We recognized this was a problem and we needed to do things differently."

Now, ER doctors send letters to the children's primary care physicians notifying them of an emergency room visit. Parents are educated on the intricacies of asthma and given a months-long plan on how to help their child manage the condition. And some doctors will prescribe asthma medicine before the family leaves the hospital.

Rafei acknowledges that emergency room doctors have taken on the role of primary care physicians. And while the situation is not ideal, he says, it is grounded in the reality that people seek routine care at hospitals.

They also are flocking to health clinics around the city, many of which are struggling to cope with that demand.

Baltimore Medical System, a nonprofit that operates five health centers in the city and two in Baltimore County, has a staff of 37 primary care doctors to care for roughly 47,000 patients - about 600 of whom visit on a given day, said CEO Jay Wolvovsky.

While the health centers receive federal funding, about 75 percent of the charity care the system provides it pays for on its own, he said. Wolvovsky said next year's budget is tight, and he projects that Baltimore Medical System might only break even.

"The problem for us is expanding capacity," he said. "There are some grants, but there is only so far an organization like ours can expand and stay viable."

source

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Pursuing Charitable Mission Leaves a Hospital Struggling

Pa Than's chest hurt so much that friends drove him to the emergency room. The hospital they took him to that day last summer diagnosed the Burmese refugee with advanced lung cancer and gave him a prescription for hospice care.

Today, Mr. Than, who is 28 years old and speaks almost no English, is responding to a cocktail of two chemotherapy drugs and a third medicine at a different hospital -- Mount Sinai Hospital in Chicago. His doctor there says the treatment may not cure him, but it should at least give him a shot at surviving another couple of years.

"A young man with a potentially treatable cancer should have the right to choose life-saving therapy," says the doctor, Pam Khosla, division head of the department of hematology and oncology at Mount Sinai.

Mount Sinai has become the medical safety net for a large segment of Chicago's destitute.

Providing all patients, rich or poor, the same standards of care is one way that Mount Sinai tries to live up to its obligations as a nonprofit hospital exempt from taxes. Located amid the blight of Chicago's West Side, Mount Sinai also tries to tackle its community's social ills.

It employs former gang members to warn children away from street violence. Two full-time employees' sole responsibility is to get neighborhood residents to quit smoking. Another group of employees is charged with monitoring teenage mothers to try to delay a second pregnancy and the downward spiral that often accompanies it.

"We can't be part of this community if we're not trying to change people's lives and make it better," says Alan H. Channing, Mount Sinai's chief executive.

While a number of nonprofit hospitals have grown into profit machines in recent years, some, like Mount Sinai, have stuck to their charitable mission but struggled financially. These institutions are usually located in inner cities and not anchored to big nonprofit systems, nor can they rely on government support the way county or state hospitals can.

In return for exemption from local, state and federal taxes, nonprofit hospitals are expected to provide benefits to their community, including charity care for the poor. Surplus revenues are supposed to be channeled back into operations.

Mount Sinai has teetered between a small net income and annual losses as high as $15 million over the past five years. While some large nonprofit hospitals have amassed billions of dollars in reserves, Mount Sinai's days of cash on hand -- a common gauge of a hospital's solvency -- is sometimes measured in hours.

Mount Sinai's struggles reflect in part a paucity of government incentives for nonprofit hospitals to operate in inner cities. Earlier this decade, Illinois introduced a subsidy program to offset losses hospitals incur from accepting Medicaid, the government health-insurance plan for the poor, which often doesn't cover costs. Because of the way it is designed, the program makes higher payments to one of Chicago's richest nonprofit hospitals, University of Chicago Hospitals, than it does to Mount Sinai.

Mount Sinai's precarious finances are reflected in its ramshackle facilities. Paint peels from some ceilings, baseboards are cracked and dingy, and the maintenance chief sometimes jump-starts the antiquated radiator-heat system with a few bangs of his hammer. In one part of the hospital sit the remains of three 1940s-era sit-in phone booths.

Earlier this decade, the federal government threatened to suspend Medicare payments to the hospital unless it made upgrades, including a new sprinkler system in the event of a fire. Mount Sinai couldn't afford the $8 million investment, so the state ended up giving it the money.

"Our good work is not reflected in the cosmetics of our facility," a Mount Sinai spokeswoman says.

Mount Sinai opened in 1919 to serve two goals: provide medical care to Chicago's poor Eastern European Jewish immigrants and give the city's Jewish doctors, who were then discriminated against, a place to train and practice.

In the 1960s, the hospital's neighborhood, known as Lawndale, experienced a dramatic demographic shift that mirrored similar changes occurring across many American cities. The Eastern European Jewish residents left for the suburbs, and African-Americans moved in.

But rather than go to Mount Sinai, which had become known as a white hospital, the neighborhood's black population traveled farther to get treated at other institutions. "Whether it was true or not, they felt unwelcome," says Ruth Rothstein, who started working at Mount Sinai in 1966.

With fewer patients seeking care there, the hospital's revenues fell to unsustainable levels. By 1972, when Ms. Rothstein became chief executive, the hospital's board faced a choice: follow its former clientele to the suburbs, or stay and renew its commitment to the community. The board voted to stick it out.

Ms. Rothstein and her staff hit the streets. They joined community organizations and churches, and helped launch programs to help people purchase their own homes. "There was an understanding that a hospital is not an island to itself," Ms. Rothstein, now 85, recalls.

Prescription for Profit

Today, Mount Sinai is the medical safety net for a large segment of Chicago's destitute. Seventy-two percent of its patients are either uninsured or covered by Medicaid. Only 10% have commercial health insurance -- the only type that gives the hospital a profit margin.

The incidence of heart disease, infant mortality, asthma and HIV in the area surrounding the hospital far outpaces the rates in greater Chicago and the rest of the country. The life expectancy of local residents is a full decade less than the U.S. average. Poverty is rampant.

To the north of the hospital, the neighborhood now referred to as North Lawndale is more than 90% black. In South Lawndale, about 85% are Hispanic. Their choices for health care have been dwindling.

Two years ago, Advocate Health Care, a large nonprofit system with more than $1 billion in cash and investments, shut down neighboring Bethany Hospital and turned it into a long-term care facility. Advocate is in the middle of a $500 million expansion program in the Illinois suburbs.

Spokeswoman Kelly Jo Golson says Advocate determined there was a "surplus of hospital beds and a significant duplication of health-care services" on the West Side of Chicago, and turning Bethany into a long-term care facility served an unmet need in that part of the city. Advocate is spending $60 million to upgrade one of its other inner-city hospitals in Chicago, she added.

Bethany's closure strained an already stretched Mount Sinai. The hospital's emergency room saw an immediate surge in admissions, from 35,000 patients a year before Bethany closed to about 58,000 today. "We couldn't plan for something like that," says Leslie Zun, the hospital's chief of emergency medicine.

Mount Sinai is considering limiting the number of patients it admits who don't live in the area. It spent $16.6 million on charity care last year and another $16.2 million to subsidize specialists, such as cardiologists, who wouldn't otherwise work in the neighborhood because reimbursements are so low.

Those expenditures eat up nearly 10% of its revenues, forcing Mount Sinai to put off investments in new equipment, such as a second cardiac-catheterization laboratory to perform artery-clearing operations that help prevent heart attacks. The cath lab has "been on the table for four years," says Mount Sinai's chief financial officer, Charles Weis. "Heart disease is a community need, but we have to balance the resources."

To try to collect on unpaid bills, Mount Sinai used to sue some patients, who had resources but weren't paying. It filed 119 such suits between 1999 and 2006. But it has since stopped the practice and raised its income threshold to allow more patients to qualify for charity care.

Mount Sinai's emergency room reflects some of the challenge of doing business in one of Chicago's toughest neighborhoods. Digital thermometers are chained to the wall; even so, someone recently ripped one off and walked away with it. The hospital says it spends $20,000 a year replacing stolen equipment.

Dr. Zun, who has worked at Mount Sinai for over 20 years, wants to buy his staff the cellphonelike devices that many ERs use to speed up communication between doctors and nurses. But, at $7,000 for a full set, "it's a luxury we can't afford," he says. Instead, he and his colleagues rely on bulky older cordless telephones with spotty reception.

The Mount Sinai ER is sometimes referred to as the "knife and gun club" because of the frequent stabbings and shootings it handles. A few years ago, Dr. Zun hired a violence-prevention worker to help teenage gunshot victims treated at the hospital get back on track. He says the results were promising, but grant funding dried up and the program was canceled.

The hospital continues to combat violence through another program that employs former gang members in wheelchairs to mentor neighborhood youth. The program's head, Devoy Boyd, was shot in the back when he was 17, paralyzing him from the waist down.

On a chilly November afternoon, Mr. Boyd, now 31, wheeled himself into the cafeteria of Learn Charter School, a few miles from Mount Sinai, and faced four dozen sixth-graders. Holding up props, he went into excruciating detail about how he has to use a catheter to urinate. "If you're paralyzed, you have to do this every four to six hours, every day for the rest of your life," he told the children.

"Do it hurt?" one girl asked.

"If you feel below your waist then, yeah, it hurt," Mr. Boyd answered.

It's difficult to know how much of an impact Mr. Boyd has on these children. When he spoke to a group of troubled teens about to be released from a juvenile detention center recently, he says half took his card but only one later reached out to him.

Mount Sinai thinks such programs do pay dividends. By helping convince children to stay in school, get jobs and become productive members of society, the hospital says the programs cut down on crime and poverty, contributing to the community's welfare and health. Mr. Channing, the CEO, says some kids may even someday become paying clients.

There's another economic incentive: Patching up gunshot wounds is an unprofitable line of work. Each shooting victim costs up to $12,000 to care for, and the patients rarely have health insurance or qualify for Medicaid.

Some of Mount Sinai's other programs are actually detrimental to its bottom line. Because Mount Sinai is a designated children's hospital and level-one trauma center, Medicaid pays it higher rates for a small number of cases, such as children needing emergency attention. So when children with asthma come to its emergency room, Mount Sinai makes money caring for them. But the hospital employs educators to coach families of asthmatic children on how to control the disease and avoid emergency visits.

One of the beneficiaries is 4-year-old Roberto Leanos, a frequent ER visitor since he was a baby. Ana Rosa Garcia, the educator assigned to his case, spotted problems when she walked into the Leanos family's apartment in 2007. There was wall-to-wall carpeting -- a breeding ground for dust mites, which can trigger asthma symptoms. Fluffy blankets on Roberto's bed were also problematic. Mrs. Garcia convinced Roberto's mother, Maria Leanos, to rip out the carpet and brought her hypoallergenic sheets and mattress covers.

She also taught the 28-year-old mother how to administer an inhaler to Roberto and gave her an "asthma action plan." It came in handy one evening when Roberto became lethargic. Mrs. Leanos's instinct was to put him to bed, but the action plan said in capital letters to "call for an ambulance now." Minutes after he reached Mount Sinai, his condition worsened and he was put on a ventilator. But he recovered and hasn't had to return to the hospital.

Mr. Than, the Burmese refugee, found his way to Mount Sinai in August when an internist who treats patients for World Relief, an agency that helps refugees resettle in the U.S., decided to get him a second opinion.

Mount Sinai confirmed he had lung cancer and referred Mr. Than back to the hospital that originally diagnosed him, Provena Mercy Medical Center, for treatment. Provena Mercy is located in Aurora, Ill., a small city an hour and a half west of Chicago where Mr. Than lives with three other recently arrived refugees.

Mr. Than wanted to be treated in Aurora because he was making new friends there and could take the bus to the hospital. But Steve Wiggers, Mr. Than's case manager at World Relief, says Provena Mercy told him the cancer was "too far advanced" and recommended hospice care when Mr. Than was readmitted there.

Mr. Than's medical file says Ramesh Kola, the Provena Mercy oncologist who examined him, wrote that he had an "incurable" cancer, "irrespective to treatment." Mr. Than was given a prescription for hospice care signed by another Provena doctor.

While Mr. Than's Mount Sinai doctor says that Provena Mercy didn't give the patient the right to choose life-saving therapy, Provena says that it offered the full range of treatment options.

In an interview, Dr. Kola says hospice care was one of three options he raised with Mr. Than, and that the other two were treatments. Dr. Kola says his consultation note also stated: "we discussed options of supportive care with hospice, treatment with Tarceva and IV chemotherapy."

Provena Mercy is part of Provena Health, a Catholic nonprofit hospital system, that has been at the center of a debate over how much charity care tax-exempt hospitals should provide.

Illinois stripped another Provena hospital, Provena Covenant, of its tax exemptions in 2004 after deeming that it provided too little free care to the poor. Provena fought the ruling, and the case wound its way through the state's courts. The Illinois Supreme Court agreed to hear it last month; a verdict isn't likely until next year.

Provena Health maintains that its charity care is adequate. In a recent statement about the case, it said it provides "vital services every day to those in our community who have no other health care options."

A spokeswoman for Provena Mercy said while she couldn't discuss specifics of Mr. Than's case, "the medical record clearly indicates that the physician did indeed offer this patient clinical options in addition to hospice." She said a "prescription for hospice does not indicate that other clinical care options were not presented to the patient." She also said Provena "does not deny care to any patient."

Mr. Than ultimately received chemotherapy at Mount Sinai. Dr. Khosla, of Mount Sinai, says the cancer has shrunk mildly after two rounds of chemo.

So far, Mr. Than's care has cost Mount Sinai about $34,500. Though he temporarily qualifies for Medicaid as a political refugee, the hospital doesn't expect the government program to reimburse it more than $22,700.

source

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Uninsured Put a Strain on Hospitals

NY Times - As increasing numbers of the unemployed and uninsured turn to the nation’s emergency rooms as a medical last resort, doctors warn that the centers — many already overburdened — could have even more trouble handling the heart attacks, broken bones and other traumas that define their core mission.

Even before the recession became evident, many emergency rooms around the country were already overcrowded, with dangerously long waits for some patients and the frequent need to redirect ambulances to other hospitals.

“We have no capacity now,” said Dr. Angela F. Gardner, the president-elect of the American College of Emergency Physicians, which represents 27,000 emergency doctors. “There’s no way we have room for any more people to come to the table.”

In a report to be released Tuesday, her group warns that the nation’s system of emergency rooms is in “serious condition.” Dr. Gardner argues that any public discussion of overhauling the current health system must include the nation’s emergency departments.

The number of patients coming to emergency departments has been steadily increasing. Helping push up that volume have been the growing ranks of the uninsured, because emergency rooms are legally obliged to see all patients who enter their doors, regardless of their ability to pay. But even insured patients who have no quick access to regular doctors are also showing up — among them older people, who represent the fastest growing population of emergency room visitors.

So far, there are no firm figures on the recent influx. But even two years ago, when a government survey found that the annual volume of visits to emergency departments had reached 120 million — a third higher than a decade earlier — doctors considered many emergency rooms overburdened.

Now the recession, whose full impact is yet to be seen, threatens to make conditions even worse, emergency doctors say. Hospitals are absorbing increasing amounts in unpaid medical bills, and some are already experiencing much higher numbers of patients without insurance.

For example, Denver Health, a public hospital system, had a 19 percent increase in emergency visits by uninsured patients in November — to 3,325, up from 2,792 a year earlier.

“Virtually every time I work a nine-hour shift, I encounter a couple of patients who have never been here before because they’ve just lost their insurance,” said Dr. Vincent J. Markovchick, the director of the hospital’s emergency medical services.

They include patients like Matthew Armijo, 29, who was laid off from his client services job at a technology company in August and could continue his health insurance only through October. He showed up at Denver Health’s urgent care center, a part of the emergency department, suffering from increasing abdominal pain. Mr. Armijo said he went there because he would not have to pay anything.

Denver Health expects the amount of care it delivers for which it will never be paid to grow to more than $300 million this year, compared with $276 million in 2007.

Some patients are people who have delayed seeking medical care as long as they can, like those who arrive during an asthma attack after deferring treatment.

“I am definitely seeing patients coming in presenting worse in their illness because they are further along,” said Dr. Katherine A. Bakes, the director of the program’s emergency services for children.

Other doctors around the country also report treating people who seem to have no other option. One emergency room doctor in Iowa, Dr. Thomas E. Benzoni, said he recently saw a mother come in with her two children for what he thought was routine care. When he asked her why she had not gone to her family doctor, she said she did not have health insurance.

“I don’t know what else she was supposed to do,” Dr. Benzoni said.

The increase is not affecting all emergency rooms. Some emergency physicians, in fact, said there had actually been a recent decline in visits. A report by the American Hospital Association for July, August and September found a slight overall decrease in hospital traffic, including emergency visits, as some people apparently sought to avoid spending money on anything they did not deem absolutely essential.

But as the recession continues, many officials of the college of emergency doctors predict it is only a matter of time until the rising number of uninsured and the delays in getting primary care create a crisis.

“I think we’re seeing the tip,” said Dr. Nicholas J. Jouriles, the group’s current president. Patients, he said, will have no choice but to come to the emergency department when they have no money or insurance. “They will get turned away elsewhere,” he said.

One of the doctors’ major concerns is the long waits by patients requiring a hospital bed. The doctors group, surveying its members last year, learned of at least 200 deaths related to the practice of “boarding” — in which patients on stretchers line the corridors until they can be moved into a bed.

“Crowding is a national public health problem,” said Dr. Jesse M. Pines, an emergency physician in Philadelphia.

Patients forced to wait for hours on end for a bed clearly suffer.

“It was pure hell,” recalled Robert Roth, whose 90-year-old mother, Kato, last year spent 36 hours at the emergency department of a Queens hospital, near her home in Jackson Heights, waiting for a room after going to the emergency room in the middle of the night. Mrs. Roth, who had a recent series of falls, said she had been hearing music in her ears, and both her son and the doctor he called were worried about a possible stroke.

After the first five hours of waiting, she became increasingly disoriented and delusional. Mr. Roth was unable to stay with her during the entire wait. After he left and returned, he said, the hospital staff told him they had no idea where she was. She turned up in an empty room off the emergency department, and her physical and mental condition had clearly deteriorated, Mr. Roth said. She believed that she had been kidnapped.

When she had to go several weeks later to another emergency department in Manhattan, she endured a 20-hour wait for a room, again becoming disoriented after several hours, forcing her to be sedated.

The emergency staffs “just seemed overwhelmed, overwhelmed,” said Mr. Roth, who wondered why emergency departments could not handle the elderly in a special fashion.

Dr. Ann S. O’Malley is a physician and senior researcher for the Center for Studying Health System Change, a nonprofit group in Washington that has studied emergency services in different communities. While some hospitals have taken steps to reduce crowding and move patients more efficiently from the emergency department into rooms, Dr. O’Malley said, others have responded by expanding their facilities — attracting more patients.

“Emergency departments,” she said, “are a kind of barometer of the general health of the rest of the system.”

Dr. Eric J. Lavonas, an emergency physician in Denver, said: “The nation’s emergency rooms are the end of the line. We will strain and stretch and bulge under the weight.”

Dr. Gardner, of the emergency doctors’ group, said the question now is whether the emergency room safety net will break — how often people with heart attacks will not be able to get care in time to be saved. Her group’s report, she said, is meant to alert people to the precarious nature of the system.

“What they don’t understand,” she said, “is that the system is fundamentally flawed and will fail.”

source

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Hospitals face mounting bills for charity care - TN

In the past five years, uncompensated medical care at Nashville’s 10 major hospitals has ballooned nearly 140 percent.

The region’s hospitals delivered $470 million worth of medical care last year that was not fully paid for, with Vanderbilt Medical Center carrying nearly half the load, according to the Tennessee Department of Health’s annual hospital report.

The report figures uncompensated care by combining charity care, medically indigent care and bad debt. Hospitals absorb these bills for the uninsured, patients who are unable or unwilling to pay and other medical services given free of charge.

The numbers will continue to spike, says Chris Taylor, chief financial officer of HCA TriStar Health System, where costs for uncompensated care are expected to increase an additional $60 million this year.

“The current economy shows what we are dealing with,” Taylor says. “Unemployment is higher, and people are waiting much longer (to get medical care) and ending up in emergency rooms.”

Vanderbilt Medical Center has carried the largest burden regionally.

In 2007, the nonprofit hospital provided 48 percent — or $225 million — of all reported uncompensated care delivered by large hospitals in Davidson County, the state report shows. In the past five years, the hospital has consistently accounted for 40 percent or more of the county’s uncompensated care.

The heavy load is partially because patients are often taken to Vanderbilt when they can’t get immediate specialty care at other hospitals.

“It’s our whole array of specialists,” says Warren Beck, Vanderbilt’s finance director. “If patients can’t get the care elsewhere, they are going to end up here. Our system allows a broad access to the uninsured.”

Other hospitals also are taking hits.

Metro Nashville General Hospital reported $52 million of uncompensated care last year. That’s four times less than Vanderbilt, but a significant amount for the 150-bed hospital, compared with Vandy’s 847 licensed beds.

HCA TriStar’s five for-profit hospitals — Centennial Medical Center, Skyline Medical Center, Southern Hills Medical Center, Summit Medical Center and the Skyline Madison campus — combined to provide 25 percent of Davidson County’s uncompensated care. The TriStar hospitals have a combined 1,364 beds.

The city’s faith-based hospitals, Saint Thomas and Baptist, provided 15 percent of the city’s uncompensated care last year. The two hospitals have a total of 1,224 licensed beds.

Over the five-year period, uncompensated care costs at Baptist Hospital increased 209 percent to nearly $36 million. At Saint Thomas Hospital, costs rose 127 percent to nearly $39 million.

Beck says uncompensated care has spiked since 2005, when thousands of Tennesseans were involuntarily removed from the rolls of TennCare, the state’s version of Medicare. Vanderbilt is projecting $285 million in uncompensated care this year, up $60 million from 2007.

Vanderbilt’s size, scope and expertise drive the patient load. It is the region’s only Level 1 trauma center, which means 24-hour availability to in-house specialists in fields such as orthopedic surgery, neurosurgery, anesthesiology, radiology and internal medicine.

To help cover the costs, Vanderbilt received a one-time payment of $1.5 million this year, from a state pool of $10 million distributed among trauma centers.

HCA TriStar’s Taylor thinks neighborhood clinics hold promise for treating patients before they end up in emergency rooms.

“I don’t think there’s enough of them,” Taylor says. “There’s a lot of inappropriate use of emergency rooms where we see severe situations that haven’t had preventative care.”

Vanderbilt’s Beck says more private doctors, who are required to sign off on admitting patients to area hospitals, could admit and care for more uninsured patients at their respective hospitals, which would help share the burden of the costs.

“Many of them take on these patients, but there are some who admit very few,” he says.

source

Saturday, November 8, 2008

Statement by Lloyd H. Dean, President/CEO, Catholic Healthcare West

Statement to the New President-Elect of the United States by Lloyd H. Dean, President/CEO, Catholic Healthcare West

On behalf of Catholic Healthcare West, I congratulate President-elect Barack Obama and look forward to the new administration's focus on healthcare reform.

Repairing the nation's healthcare system must become a top priority, both for the overall well-being of the people and for our nation's economy. The current system is unsustainable. Right now, 46 million people in the country do not have healthcare insurance and are receiving their care in the most expensive and inefficient way -- by relying on hospital emergency rooms. This cost is a huge burden on all of society. We can and must do better.

Access to healthcare is a fundamental human right. To achieve meaningful health reform, we will continue to advocate with local, state, and federal governments for a system characterized by:

  • Universal Access. Every person has the right to be treated with dignity, including the right to high quality, compassionate healthcare.

  • Stable Financing. A healthcare system that provides universal coverage to all people must include a financing system that ensures reliable, long-term access to care.

  • Improved Quality. Quality must become the primary focus for measuring the success of the healthcare system.

  • Improved Accountability. Local, state and federal governments need to take greater responsibility for ensuring healthcare is fully available, adequately financed, and of the highest quality possible.

  • We look forward to working with the new administration and the new Congress in solving this urgent problem.

    About Catholic Healthcare West

    Catholic Healthcare West (CHW), headquartered in San Francisco, CA, is a system of 41 hospitals and medical centers in California, Arizona and Nevada. Founded in 1986, it is the eighth largest hospital system in the nation and the largest not-for-profit hospital provider in California. CHW is committed to delivering compassionate, high-quality, affordable healthcare services with special attention to the poor and underserved. The CHW network of nearly 10,000 physicians and approximately 53,000 employees provides healthcare services to more than five million people annually. In 2008, CHW provided $967 million in charity care and unsponsored community benefit. For more information, please visit our website at www.chwHEALTH.org.

    source

    Friday, November 7, 2008

    Hospitals See Drop in Paying Patients

    In another sign of the economy’s toll on the nation’s health care system, some hospitals say they are seeing fewer paying patients — even as greater numbers of people are showing up at emergency rooms unable to pay their bills.

    While the full effects of the downturn are likely to become more evident in coming months as more people lose their jobs and their insurance coverage, some hospitals say they are already experiencing a fall-off in patient admissions.

    Some patients with insurance seem to be deferring treatments like knee replacements, hernia repairs and weight-loss surgeries — the kind of procedures that are among the most lucrative to hospitals. Just as consumers are hesitant to make any sort of big financial decision right now, some patients may feel too financially insecure to take time off work or spend what could be thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket expenses for elective treatments.

    The possibility of putting off an expensive surgery or other major procedure has now become a frequent topic of conversation with patients, said Dr. Ted Epperly, a family practice doctor in Boise, Idaho, who also serves as president of the American Academy of Family Physicians. For some patients, he said, it is a matter of choosing between such fundamental needs as food and gas and their medical care. “They wait,” he said.

    The loss of money-making procedures comes at a difficult time for hospitals because these treatments tend to subsidize the charity care and unpaid medical bills that are increasing as a result of the slow economy.

    “The numbers are down in the past month, there’s no question about it,” said Dr. Richard Friedman, a surgeon at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York, although he said it said it was too early to call the decline a trend.

    But many hospitals are responding quickly to a perceived change in their circumstances. Shands HealthCare, a nonprofit Florida hospital system, cited the poor economy and lower patient demand when it announced last month that it would shutter one of its eight hospitals and move patients and staff to its nearby facilities.

    The 367-bed hospital that is closing, in Gainesville, lost $12 million last year, said Timothy Goldfarb, the system’s chief executive. “We cannot carry it anymore,” he said.

    Some other hospitals, while saying they have not yet seen actual declines in patient admissions, have tried to curb costs by cutting jobs in recent weeks in anticipation of harder times. That includes prominent institutions like Massachusetts General in Boston and the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, as well as smaller systems like Sunrise Health in Las Vegas.

    “It’s safe to say hospitals are no longer recession-proof,” said David A. Rock, a health care consultant in New York.

    A September survey of 112 nonprofit hospitals by a Citi Investment Research analyst, Gary Taylor, found that overall inpatient admissions were down 2 to 3 percent compared with a year earlier. About 62 percent of the hospitals in the survey reported flat or declining patient admissions.

    Separately, HCA, the Nashville chain that operates about 160 for-profit hospitals around the country, reported flat admissions for the three months ended Sept. 30 compared with the period a year earlier, and a slight decline in inpatient surgeries.

    Many people are probably going to the hospital only when they absolutely need to. “The only way they are going to tap the health care system is through the emergency room,” Mr. Taylor said.

    And now, as the economy has slid more steeply toward recession in recent weeks, patient admissions seem to have declined even more sharply, some hospital industry experts say. “What we have not seen through midyear this year is the dramatic slowdown in volume we’re seeing right now,” said Scot Latimer, a consultant with Kurt Salmon Associates, which works closely with nonprofit hospitals.

    While the drop-off in patient admissions may still seem relatively slight, hospital executives and consultants say it is already having a profound impact on many hospitals’ profitability. As fewer paying customers show up, there has been a steady increase in the demand for services by patients without insurance or other financial wherewithal, many of whom show up at hospital emergency rooms — which are legally obliged to treat them.

    “It’s disproportionately affecting the bottom line,” Mr. Latimer said.

    In California, for example, the amount of bad debt and charity care among hospitals has been steadily climbing, to $7.1 billion last year from about $5.8 billion in 2005. Those numbers could approach $8 billion for 2008, according to an analysis by Kurt Salmon.

    The situation is exposing a main vulnerability of the nation’s hospital care system, which executives say relies heavily on private insurance to subsidize certain services. When there is a decline in profitable procedures paid for by private insurance, hospitals have less money to offset the relatively lower fees they receive from government insurance programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

    “What happens in our country is that there’s really a hidden tax built in,” said Richard L. Gundling, an executive with a trade group for hospital financial executives, the Healthcare Financial Management Association. “Hospitals have to balance the mix of patients in order to survive.”

    The amount of charity care provided by Shands HealthCare, the operator of the Gainesville hospital, has doubled in the last four years, to $115 million in fiscal 2008, Mr. Goldfarb said. He worries that the financial outlook will become even worse, with the prospect of payment cuts from state governments that are facing large budget shortfalls.

    “If we’re going to survive the next few years,” he said, “we have to circle the wagons.”

    The rapid moves by hospitals to cut costs — by laying off workers, consolidating facilities and freezing construction and other capital spending — are an abrupt change for an industry traditionally seen as insulated from economic woes.

    Some hospital executives say they are simply being prudent. The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, for example, is eliminating 500 jobs. The hospital system, which includes 20 hospitals and serves a large portion of Medicare and Medicaid patients, says that so far it has not seen a drop in patient admissions, but growth is tailing off.

    “It’s much, much slower than we’ve seen in years past,” said Robert A. DeMichiei, Pittsburgh’s chief financial officer.

    Mr. DeMichiei said Pittsburgh was mainly trying to reduce administrative jobs as a way to keep ahead of the worsening economy. Because large hospital groups like his have become more professionally managed in recent years, he said, they are no longer slow to reduce expenses.

    Hospital executives “are beginning to act more like Corporate America,” said Mr. DeMichiei, whose own résumé includes various jobs at General Electric.

    Another source of financial anxiety, hospitals say, is the continued difficulty in raising money through the credit markets. The majority of the nation’s hospitals are nonprofit, and they often raise capital through the municipal bond market to erect new buildings or make other significant capital investments. Because many hospitals say they are still unable to borrow easily, they have reacted by scaling back projects or holding off on major purchases.

    “We are being extremely cautious about approving spending in these 60 to 90 days, until the markets stabilize,” said Michael A. Slubowski, the president of hospital and health networks for Trinity Health, a large Catholic system based in Novi, Mich., which operates nearly four dozen hospitals, mostly scattered across the Midwest.

    While Trinity says it has not seen an overall reduction in its patient admissions, Mr. Slubowski says many of his counterparts have. “People are seeing declines,” he said.

    Making matters worse for some hospitals has been a slowdown in bill payments, particularly by state Medicaid programs. The money hospitals are owed for their services — their accounts receivable — is growing, said Mr. Rock, the health care consultant, who works for the investment and consulting firm Carl Marks & Company in New York. “What we’re finding is one of the key drivers is Medicaid,” he said.

    Many hospital executives also expect outright reductions in payments by Medicaid and Medicare.

    Mr. Rock predicts that many hospitals will soon start to reconsider the services they provide, with an eye toward scaling back or eliminating some altogether. Procedures that rely heavily on patients’ making sizable cash outlays, like bariatric surgery, are particularly vulnerable, he said.

    Hospital executives concede that they may not be as directly affected by the weak economy as retailers and banks, but they also say they are bracing for what is shaping up to be a severe and prolonged recession.

    “There’s a lot of C.F.O. doom and gloom,” said Robert Shapiro, the chief financial officer at North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health System. “The sky may be really falling this time.”

    source

    Emergency room too costly for minor care (SC)

    Greenville County residents who lack health insurance are turning to hospital emergency rooms in increasing numbers for non-emergency care. Patients are not turned away, and they shouldn't be, but ERs are expensive health-care facilities, and non-emergency visits drive up health-care costs for everyone. Those minor-care cases also place tremendous strains on ERs that already struggle to handle their emergency cases.

    But the uninsured -- and underinsured -- have few other options when they're sick. Health-care officials believe the situation will only get worse as unemployment rises and more people lose health insurance.

    The task for elected officials will be to find ways to expand the accessibility and affordability of primary care in South Carolina. Hospitals should use their considerable clout in this state to push for more options for low-income South Carolinians.

    A recent community assessment found that more than a quarter of the visits to Greenville Memorial Hospital's emergency room this year have been for non-emergencies. At Bon Secours St. Francis Health System, it's is closer to 35 percent, hospital officials say. These conditions range from headaches and minor cuts to insect bites and sore throats.

    The rising use of Greenville ERs for non-emergencies follows a nationwide trend. Not only are more uninsured residents using the ER but many Medicaid patients use the ER because they often have long waits for care in other settings. Many doctors are limiting the number of Medicaid patients they'll accept because of low Medicaid reimbursement rates for physicians.

    The recent health assessment by the organization Greenville Forward found that 14.4 percent of Greenville County's population is uninsured, up from 10.6 percent in 2003. By far, the majority of the 65,500 uninsured residents are in working families.

    To deal with increasing non-emergencies, Greenville hospitals use a variety of strategies, according to a recent Greenville News story. At St. Francis, for instance, all ER patients are screened for severity. The sickest are seen first. Non-urgent cases are typically seen by nurse practitioners who assess the condition and call a physician if needed. There's also a case manager who gives patients information about free clinics, community health centers and urgent-care centers.

    Among other alternatives for the uninsured are local free medical clinics. But these facilities already are struggling to keep up with the need. More community health centers and low-cost clinics are needed in low-income neighborhoods.

    Gov. Mark Sanford and state lawmakers could have strengthened the state Medicaid system by raising the cigarette tax and directing new revenues toward health care for the poor. But proposed cigarette taxes failed in both the regular legislative session and the recently ended special session.

    Clearly the ER is not an efficient place to deliver non-emergency care. The costs of this very expensive care are borne by all taxpayers and everyone who has private health insurance. That's why everyone has a stake in pressing for more options for the uninsured and underinsured.

    source