"The plan is bold, and to some, risky. In short, it calls for paying healthcare providers to keep people healthy instead of paying for the number of visits made to the doctor. It allows the veil of secrecy in healthcare prices to be lifted. It creates market-based competition, not competition by government mandate, among healthcare providers. It creates financial incentives for quality of care, not quantity of care.
Like any good plan, it will cost money. Depending on how many pieces are implemented at one time, it could cost anywhere from $60 million to $1 billion. Those costs create potential roadblocks, given the state’s budget deficit. It may be possible, however, to implement crucial pieces of the plan, such as payment reform, without a lot of cost. And it seems the reform itself is more important to get done first than expanding eligibility of MinnesotaCare, the state’s health insurance program for lower income families.
The essence of the plan came from the fairly similar conclusions of two bipartisan panels commissioned by Gov. Pawlenty and the Legislature. The governor’s Health Care Task Force and the Legislature’s Health Care Access Commission consulted some 200 experts to come up with a plan that considers all points of view and the interests of stakeholders. It’s unusual for such a complex issue to build that kind of consensus, says Maureen Reed, a physician, the former Medical Director for Health Partners and former Independence Party candidate for lieutenant governor. She is part of a diverse group that is pushing for passage of the comprehensive plan this year."
(full story)
Friday, April 25, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment