It was ignorance
that doomed the expansion proposal this year and allowed legislators to
be suckered by opponents’ Obamacare bogey man arguments. Among the most
vocal opponents, Gov. Pete Ricketts complained the Medicaid proposal was
an unaffordable expansion of government and that Nebraskans could not
rely on Uncle Sam to continue with its share of funding.
Supporters of the measure said
Nebraska will miss out on billions in federal funds and leave almost
77,000 people without health coverage.
Those 77,000 uninsured Nebraskans
are time bombs who threaten the financial health of small rural
hospitals that cannot absorb the costs of non-paying patients. Last
year, the town of Tilden lost its hospital, and now others could be at
risk.
In their cost/benefit study of
the proposed Medicaid expansion, two University of Nebraska at Kearney
professors concluded that providing health coverage for low-income
Nebraskans is, in effect, an insurance policy against bankruptcy for
hospitals.
The study by UNK economics
professor Allan Jenkins and management professor Ron Konecny noted that
during the first five years of expansion, the state would receive nearly
$2.1 billion — or about $992,000 daily — in federal expansion funding.
“These are dollars Nebraska
taxpayers are currently sending to Washington, D.C., that could be
recaptured to contribute to the state’s economy and a healthier, more
productive workforce,” said the study’s executive summary. The UNK profs
concluded that infusing $2.1 billion in federal money would generate $5
billion in increased economic activity in Nebraska.
Saving rural hospitals, boosting
economic activity and creating jobs are logical reasons to expand
Medicaid, but there also are moral arguments. Why should 77,000
low-income Nebraskans be denied health coverage when providing it could
be such a boon to the state?
Lawmakers need to know more. An
interim study is needed. Also needed is a stronger, united voice from
the Nebraska Hospital Association and other interests who intimately
understand what is at stake.
source
source
No comments:
Post a Comment