Monday, April 13, 2015

Economy, hospitals have stake in expansion - Nebraska

It was ignorance that doomed the expansion proposal this year and allowed legislators to be suckered by opponents’ Obamacare bogey man arguments. Among the most vocal opponents, Gov. Pete Ricketts complained the Medicaid proposal was an unaffordable expansion of government and that Nebraskans could not rely on Uncle Sam to continue with its share of funding.

Supporters of the measure said Nebraska will miss out on billions in federal funds and leave almost 77,000 people without health coverage.

Those 77,000 uninsured Nebraskans are time bombs who threaten the financial health of small rural hospitals that cannot absorb the costs of non-paying patients. Last year, the town of Tilden lost its hospital, and now others could be at risk.

In their cost/benefit study of the proposed Medicaid expansion, two University of Nebraska at Kearney professors concluded that providing health coverage for low-income Nebraskans is, in effect, an insurance policy against bankruptcy for hospitals.

The study by UNK economics professor Allan Jenkins and management professor Ron Konecny noted that during the first five years of expansion, the state would receive nearly $2.1 billion — or about $992,000 daily — in federal expansion funding.

“These are dollars Nebraska taxpayers are currently sending to Washington, D.C., that could be recaptured to contribute to the state’s economy and a healthier, more productive workforce,” said the study’s executive summary. The UNK profs concluded that infusing $2.1 billion in federal money would generate $5 billion in increased economic activity in Nebraska.

Saving rural hospitals, boosting economic activity and creating jobs are logical reasons to expand Medicaid, but there also are moral arguments. Why should 77,000 low-income Nebraskans be denied health coverage when providing it could be such a boon to the state?

Lawmakers need to know more. An interim study is needed. Also needed is a stronger, united voice from the Nebraska Hospital Association and other interests who intimately understand what is at stake.

source

No comments: