Kaiser
Family Foundation chart looking at the reaction of those enrolled in
health-care plans through the Affordable Care Act marketplaces on
whether they benefited from or were negatively affected by the 2010 law.
Photo:
Kaiser Family Foundation
You might think that people enrolled in the Affordable Care Act’s
marketplace plans would like their coverage more or less depending on
whether they have a high or low deductible, or receive a subsidy to help
them pay their premium. Those factors and other elements of their
coverage matter, but by far the biggest difference between those in
marketplace plans who say they have benefited from the ACA or been
negatively affected by it is whether they are a Republican or a
Democrat. That’s one finding from an analysis of a Kaiser Family
Foundation survey of people covered in the non-group insurance market,
which provides the clearest illustration I have seen yet of how
partisanship colors people’s views of the ACA.
In the Kaiser survey, which will be published next week, 29% of
Republicans in marketplace plans (i.e., Obamacare) say they have
benefited from the ACA compared with 75% of Democrats, a 46-point
difference. There is no reason to believe that there are demographic
differences between these Republican or Democratic marketplace enrollees
that would explain this large of a difference in their responses. They
are all purchasing coverage in the ACA marketplaces, and most members of
each group are receiving premium subsidies under the law. Overall,
substantially more marketplace-plan enrollees say that they benefited
from the ACA (54%) than say they were negatively affected (35%).
Are Republicans more negative because they feel they were forced by
the law to purchase marketplace coverage? Or perhaps because they
associate it with President
Barack Obama,
whom they don’t like? Or because they have heard bad things about
Obamacare on right-leaning talk radio or cable news? Do Democrats say
they have benefited because they like the president and support the law
and watch left-leaning cable news? There is no way to know for sure.
What is clear, though, is that the sharpest difference between enrollees
in similar ACA marketplace plans is their partisan perspective.
Many expected that as people gained direct experience with the ACA,
those experiences would shape their views as the law evolved from a
political symbol to a reality in their lives. Advocates of the ACA
thought opinions toward the law would become more positive, and critics
felt the opposite. Six years after the Affordable Care Act became law,
partisan perspectives still seem to trump experience. It’s a reminder of
the extent to which partisanship colors perceptions of policy and
programs, including the ACA.
source
No comments:
Post a Comment